Re-Using SVG Graphics with Style
I like experimenting with new technology. SVG itself doesn’t exactly qualify as “new” anymore, its first release dates back to the final months of the dot-com bubble. However, the inclusion of SVG in HTML5 and the ever increasing browser support gives it a feeling of “oooh, shiny!”.
The ZeitLens logo is simple and based on geometric shapes, so it was a very obvious decision to hand-code it in SVG. Inclusion of the logo into the page is straightforward and possible with a couple of options. Things started getting interesting when I decided to style the logo’s appearance with CSS and to include the same logo twice. Simple, right? Here comes the fun.
Imagine beautiful SVG images
The logo is an image, so using an img
tag to include it into the page is the most reasonable approach, at least from a semantic point-of-view. This works nicely in all recent browsers, but only if both code and styling information are put into a single file. Now that last part is really bad: The whole point of CSS is to separate the presentation from the data. Including CSS into the SVG-image file goes against modularity principles and limits re-usability.
Assume we would like to style the logo matching the documents text and background colors. Following the DRY principle, these colors should be defined exactly once, most likely in the central stylesheet. This won’t work for SVG graphics included through img
elements. We would have to duplicate the color information in the logo file. Should we decide to change our main style, we’d also have to visit each graphics file changing the colors there. Using a technology like Sass is out of the question, too. What a pain.
Inline SVG
Let’s go the other way and directly include inline SVG into the page. We could reference and hence re-use the image on the same page via xlink
attributes and use
elements. Styling information could be included into the HTML either as inline CSS or with a link
element pointing to a stylesheet. In terms of modularity, this is a great improvement over the previous method.
Too bad it doesn’t work in Chrome. (Strangely enough, it does work with JavaScript disabled.) The styles are not applied to the cloned graphics. We could try to style every clone individually, but that even must not work. The official W3C recommendation states
CSS2 selectors cannot be applied to the (conceptually) cloned DOM tree
because its contents are not part of the formal document structure.
Crap. We can’t style the cloned graphics but have to duplicate the complete inline SVG in order to make it accessible to CSS selectors. This is no better than using img
elements.
object
ive SVG
There is but one option left: object
elements. The stylesheet can be specified in the XML of the graphics and it is applied correctly. Modularity is ensured; content and styling are separated nicely.
Despite object
elements working well in general, not all is good. The problem lies with Firefox 17 and NoScript. At least for me, a browser of this (or earlier) version will not display an object
when JavaScript is disabled. The placeholder looks really ugly, too. The blog should be fully functional in a one year old browser, even with an intrusive plugin like NoScript. A page with major parts of its graphical identity missing can hardly be described as fully functional. Therefor object
tags are no silver bullet, either.
This Blogs Method
While basic SVG support in browsers is good in general, they still lack full support for the specs. It is possible to make good use of SVG, but (as with most newish internet standards) one has to be careful about what does and doesn’t work. As for this blog, you can have a look at the source to check which ugly hack I resolved to for this blog. At the time of writing, I hard coded some sensible color values into the SVG. Only stylistic fine-tuning is done in CSS. I’m not happy about it, but that’s the way it is for now. I may change it once I find the time.
At least the logo came out okay.